Ontology and IB: Re-Imagining the Multinational

Brent Burmester

Advances in International Management2013https://doi.org/10.1108/s1571-5027(2013)0000026013book-chapter
ABDC C
Weight
0.56

What the paper says

Setting the multinational enterprise (MNE) apart on the basis of a weakly specified idea of foreignness may impede progress in international business (IB). The discipline lacks a paradigm to assimilate the idea of foreignness as an incident of internationality, a global condition describing the political context within which the MNE functions and which confers uniqueness on that institution. However, a plausible re-imagining of the MNE is possible and useful, and here a candidate for such an ontological shift is proffered. Rather than a firm struggling in one or more foreign contexts, the MNE is reconstructed as a foreigner contending with the responsibilities of a firm. The proposed re-imagining of the MNE is experimentally substituted for the received ontology in different IB research contexts. It transpires that this ontological revision maintains intelligibility in those contexts while usefully exposing new directions in which to pursue knowledge. In consequence of re-imagining the MNE, that institution may be situated more precisely amid the international system’s primal constituents, and links may be more effectively established with other bodies of research addressing the functioning of the international political economic system.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1571-5027(2013)0000026013

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{brent2013,
  title        = {{Ontology and IB: Re-Imagining the Multinational}},
  author       = {Brent Burmester},
  journal      = {Advances in International Management},
  year         = {2013},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1571-5027(2013)0000026013},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Ontology and IB: Re-Imagining the Multinational

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.56

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.53 × 0.4 = 0.21
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.