arbiter
JournalsAccount

Looking in, Leveraging, and Locking: An Asset-Based Framework for Economic Development Policy and Practice

Haegi Kwon

Economic Development Quarterly2025https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424251378116article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Many factors contribute to growing inequalities in the United States. This commentary identifies three common assumptions inherent to economic development practice that may contribute to these dynamics within cities and regions. By looking beyond the economic development literature, the author presents a framework that prioritizes equitable outcomes for economic development: looking in, leveraging, and locking (3Ls). Looking in refers to a process whereby stakeholders assess existing formal and informal assets to address economic concerns. Leveraging refers to how stakeholders may collectively draw from existing assets to garner additional resources to achieve shared priorities. Locking refers to ensuring that economic development activities benefit residents, particularly those most marginalized and economically vulnerable. This commentary then compares the 3L framework to others, assessing how each may be useful in advancing more equitable economic outcomes in the United States.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424251378116

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{haegi2025,
  title        = {{Looking in, Leveraging, and Locking: An Asset-Based Framework for Economic Development Policy and Practice}},
  author       = {Haegi Kwon},
  journal      = {Economic Development Quarterly},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424251378116},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Looking in, Leveraging, and Locking: An Asset-Based Framework for Economic Development Policy and Practice

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.