Central banks and external statistics: Evolution or revolution?

Paula Menezes et al.

Journal of Economic and Social Measurement2020https://doi.org/10.3233/jem-200472article
ABDC C
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

Globalisation is posing important challenges to external statistics, which have been reinforced in recent decades by rapid digital innovation, the complexity and limited transparency of multinational corporate structures, and the increased importance of global financial centres. Examples of such challenges include the fragmentation of global production chains and the changing nature of foreign direct investment. One fundamental question is whether the multipurpose analytical tool provided by external statistics should be simply adapted or radically transformed to address these issues. The experience of central banks shows that a number of alternative ways can be effectively developed in the medium term to adapt the current external statistics framework, especially by: collecting supplementary data; enhancing the infrastructure supporting compilation; focusing the analysis on large and global corporate groups; presenting more granular data for the aggregates currently compiled; and revisiting the concept of foreign direct investment.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/jem-200472

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{paula2020,
  title        = {{Central banks and external statistics: Evolution or revolution?}},
  author       = {Paula Menezes et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Economic and Social Measurement},
  year         = {2020},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/jem-200472},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Central banks and external statistics: Evolution or revolution?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.