arbiter
JournalsAccount

Women managing public services innovation: European cross-country evidence on drivers and barriers

Carolina Lopez-Nicolas et al.

Gender in Management: an international journal2026https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-03-2025-0126article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the drivers and barriers that influence women’s capacity to innovate in public services. A theoretical framework and related hypotheses are proposed by drawing on new public management theory, self-determination theory and gender theory. Design/methodology/approach The hypotheses are tested on survey data gathered in six European countries (N = 736). Findings The results show that women managing public services innovation face more barriers and drivers than men in the European context. Barriers to public services innovation in Europe are gendered. Originality/value The findings presented here challenge some assumptions from new public management theory and self-determination theory. Also, the role of women in managing public services innovation appears to be evolving over time. The implications of these findings for research and policy are highlighted.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-03-2025-0126

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{carolina2026,
  title        = {{Women managing public services innovation: European cross-country evidence on drivers and barriers}},
  author       = {Carolina Lopez-Nicolas et al.},
  journal      = {Gender in Management: an international journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-03-2025-0126},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Women managing public services innovation: European cross-country evidence on drivers and barriers

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.