arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Unconventional Monetary Policies in Emerging Markets: Turkey's Experience Through the Lens of Synthetic Control

Metin TETİK & Emine Tuğbanur Ciğeroğlu

Politicka Ekonomie: teorie, modelovani, aplikace2026https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1527article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study investigates the impact of the Central Bank of Turkey's (CBRT) unconventional monetary policy shift in 2021 particularly aggressive interest rate cuts on inflation and macroeconomic stability by applying the Synthetic Control Method (SCM).A synthetic counterfactual is constructed from countries with comparable macroeconomic characteristics to estimate what Turkey's inflation trajectory would have been in the absence of the policy change.The results reveal a sharp post-2021 inflation divergence between Turkey and its synthetic counterpart, suggesting that the surge in inflation was largely policy-induced.Placebo tests validate the statistical significance of the findings, while robustness checks confirm the stability of the results.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1527

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{metin2026,
  title        = {{Unconventional Monetary Policies in Emerging Markets: Turkey's Experience Through the Lens of Synthetic Control}},
  author       = {Metin TETİK & Emine Tuğbanur Ciğeroğlu},
  journal      = {Politicka Ekonomie: teorie, modelovani, aplikace},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1527},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Unconventional Monetary Policies in Emerging Markets: Turkey's Experience Through the Lens of Synthetic Control

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.