Climate Legislation in China: Institutional Approach and Challenges

Anni Dai & Fan Dai

UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal2025https://doi.org/10.5070/p8.61628article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Despite significant efforts towards decarbonization, China’s progress in climate legislation has been relatively slow. This paper explores China’s current climate laws and the institutional approach behind the legislating efforts, identifying a central challenge: the lack of coordination among laws enacted at different times with varied focuses. It argues that a dedicated climate law could enhance accountability for climate goals and address the gaps in climate litigation. The paper also reviews China’s lawmaking institutions, discussing the roles and interactions of key players in shaping climate governance. Additionally, it compares legislative models from other countries, proposing components that could be adapted for China. The paper concludes with recommendations for a comprehensive climate legislation framework in China.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5070/p8.61628

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{anni2025,
  title        = {{Climate Legislation in China: Institutional Approach and Challenges}},
  author       = {Anni Dai & Fan Dai},
  journal      = {UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5070/p8.61628},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Climate Legislation in China: Institutional Approach and Challenges

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.