Global Value Chains and Corporate Opposition to Sanctions

Lingbo Zhao

International Studies Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag010article
AJG 4ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Economic sanctions entail high costs not only for target states but also for sending states, particularly their business sectors. While considerable literature exists on state-level factors that affect sanction design and enforcement, less is known about business actors’ responses to and political influence on sanctions. This paper examines the circumstances under which firms attempt to influence sanction policies during the decision-making process of the state imposing them. Specifically, it investigates how firms’ international connections affect their motivation to lobby against sanctions in the US Congress. I argue that firms will be more likely to lobby against sanctions on a particular state when the state plays a more important role in the firms’ global value chains, as well as when the sanctions would harm the firms’ foreign investments and trade. I test my argument using original data on US firms’ lobbying over bills proposing economic sanctions against Russia from 2014 to 2022. The findings support my expectations. This paper is the first to explain, from the perspective of firms, how their global economic ties shape their stance on sanctions, offering an understanding of how private sector interests influence foreign policy decisions.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lingbo2026,
  title        = {{Global Value Chains and Corporate Opposition to Sanctions}},
  author       = {Lingbo Zhao},
  journal      = {International Studies Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Global Value Chains and Corporate Opposition to Sanctions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.