Childcare, Labor Supply, and Business Development: Experimental Evidence from Uganda

Kjetil Bjorvatn et al.

American Economic Journal: Applied Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20230227article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.58

Abstract

We randomly offered a childcare subsidy, an equivalent cash grant, or both to mothers of three-to-five-year-old children. The childcare subsidy substantially increased the labor supply and earnings of single mothers, highlighting the importance of time constraints for them. Among couples, childcare did not affect mothers’ labor market outcomes but instead increased fathers’ salaried employment. At the household level, childcare led to higher income and consumption and improved child development. Cash grants positively affected mothers’ labor supply and income irrespective of the household structure, suggesting the general importance of credit constraints for women’s business development. (JEL H24, J13, J16, J22, J31, O12)

13 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20230227

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kjetil2025,
  title        = {{Childcare, Labor Supply, and Business Development: Experimental Evidence from Uganda}},
  author       = {Kjetil Bjorvatn et al.},
  journal      = {American Economic Journal: Applied Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20230227},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Childcare, Labor Supply, and Business Development: Experimental Evidence from Uganda

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.58

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.60 × 0.4 = 0.24
M · momentum0.75 × 0.15 = 0.11
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.