University Participation in Rural Development in India: Tensions and Challenges in Unnat Bharat Abhiyan

Ajay Pandey & Neetu Choudhary

The International Journal of Community and Social Development2025https://doi.org/10.1177/25166026251385621article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This article is based on an assessment of the community participation process during the implementation of various activities under the Unnat Bharat Abhiyan (UBA), a programme designed to facilitate higher education institutions’ (HEIs) engagement with the rural community. Drawing from field study in four villages in the state of Haryana, India, the article provides an experiential account of the participatory process in rural India. The narrative that emerges from community assessment highlights the following challenges: lack of continuity, community fatigue, cultural gaps, lack of awareness, community expectations and rapport building. Specifically, the article reflects upon tensions and challenges that surfaced during community mobilisation and the way they hindered community participation. To address these gaps and to harness the potential of university–community partnership, the article suggests institutionalising the value of participation and empathy among the HEIs.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/25166026251385621

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ajay2025,
  title        = {{University Participation in Rural Development in India: Tensions and Challenges in Unnat Bharat Abhiyan}},
  author       = {Ajay Pandey & Neetu Choudhary},
  journal      = {The International Journal of Community and Social Development},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/25166026251385621},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

University Participation in Rural Development in India: Tensions and Challenges in Unnat Bharat Abhiyan

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.