The relationship between occupational burnout and risk perception in coal miners: neurophysiological evidence from fNIRS

Shuicheng Tian et al.

Ergonomics2026https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2026.2627528article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study aimed to examine the association between occupational burnout and risk perception ability among coal miners, providing a neurophysiological basis. The Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey was administered to 72 miners to assess burnout, while functional near-infrared spectroscopy measured hemodynamic changes in the prefrontal cortex during risk perception tasks. The findings revealed that: (1) miners with higher levels of burnout exhibited reduced risk perception capabilities; (2) the association between burnout levels and risk perception ability varied depending on whether the risk factors were human-, equipment-, environment-, or management-related; and (3) significant differences in prefrontal cortex activation were observed among miners with different levels of burnout, suggesting that burnout is associated with cognitive processing efficiency for risk information. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for enhancing miners' risk perception from the burnout perspective, potentially reducing coal mine accidents.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2026.2627528

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shuicheng2026,
  title        = {{The relationship between occupational burnout and risk perception in coal miners: neurophysiological evidence from fNIRS}},
  author       = {Shuicheng Tian et al.},
  journal      = {Ergonomics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2026.2627528},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The relationship between occupational burnout and risk perception in coal miners: neurophysiological evidence from fNIRS

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.