Vulnerabilidade e autonomia privada da pessoa idosa na contratação de operações de crédito

Isabela Rocha

Revista do CAAP2025https://doi.org/10.69881/z2d9dw03article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

With the increasing use of digital platforms for service contracting, the technological vulnerability of elderly individuals has become a central concern. Paraíba State Law 12.072/21, which requires the physical signature of elderly individuals in credit contracts entered into electronically or by phone, aims to protect this group. This study investigates whether such regulation aligns with the principle of private autonomy and constitutes an effective protective measure. The research adopts a socio-legal approach to assess the impacts of the legislation. It examines the concepts of consumer vulnerability and the hyper-vulnerability of the elderly, particularly in the digital context, characterized by complex contracts and informational asymmetry. Additionally, it discusses the principle of private autonomy, which ensures individuals the freedom to manage their legal affairs. The results show that, despite its protective intent, the requirement for a physical signature limits the autonomy of the elderly and hinders their access to technologies, without necessarily providing effective protection. It is concluded that protecting the elderly requires a balance between technological inclusion measures and respect for their private autonomy, avoiding solutions that segregate or limit their option.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.69881/z2d9dw03

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{isabela2025,
  title        = {{Vulnerabilidade e autonomia privada da pessoa idosa na contratação de operações de crédito}},
  author       = {Isabela Rocha},
  journal      = {Revista do CAAP},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.69881/z2d9dw03},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Vulnerabilidade e autonomia privada da pessoa idosa na contratação de operações de crédito

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.