Penalized empirical likelihood over decentralized networks

Jinye Du & QiHua Wang

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Statistical Methodology2026https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssb/qkag042article
AJG 4
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Empirical likelihood encounters serious computational challenges when applied to massive datasets or multiple data sources distributed across decentralized networks. This paper proposes a constrained empirical likelihood framework for decentralized networks, utilizing a novel penalization technique to obtain a penalized empirical log-likelihood. The resulting empirical log-likelihood ratio statistic is proved to be asymptotically standard chi-squared even for a divergent machine number. However, the optimization problem with the fused penalty is still hard to solve in the decentralized distributed network due to the coupling structure. To address the problem, two novel algorithms are developed to solve the optimization problem in a decentralized manner, with established convergence properties and linear convergence for the second algorithm in specific network structures. The methods are validated through simulations and real data analyses of census income and Ford gobike datasets.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssb/qkag042

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jinye2026,
  title        = {{Penalized empirical likelihood over decentralized networks}},
  author       = {Jinye Du & QiHua Wang},
  journal      = {Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Statistical Methodology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssb/qkag042},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Penalized empirical likelihood over decentralized networks

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.