Being a liminal researcher: countering normativity through affective charges

Martina Lippi

Culture and Organization2026https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2026.2642782article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In this article, I explore a new approach to researching dis/ability around neurodiversity differently, recentring on how my emotions and lived experiences relate to my experience as a liminal researcher. Going beyond the dichotomy of a traditional insider/outsider positionality, I consider how exploring the dynamic experience of being and becoming a liminal researcher provides possibilities to bring together debates about positionality, neurodiversity voices in research, and concerns in management and organisation studies around affect. Introducing three affective charges in the research encounter: (i) liminality as vulnerability, (ii) liminality as refocusing, and (iii) liminality as messiness, I explore how research encounters hold the potential to disrupt assumptions around the relations and reciprocities involved in researching. In doing so, I consider the potential to legitimise in-between knowledge as a new epistemological mode of studying and writing about dis/ability in organisations.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2026.2642782

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{martina2026,
  title        = {{Being a liminal researcher: countering normativity through affective charges}},
  author       = {Martina Lippi},
  journal      = {Culture and Organization},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2026.2642782},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Being a liminal researcher: countering normativity through affective charges

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.