← Back to results Dust in the wind? How leadership transitions unfold in purpose-oriented networks Robin Peeters et al.
Abstract Networks benefit from consciously designing their governance and leadership structure in a way that diminishes the effects of an unexpected transition, such as dual leadership from two organizations. Furthermore, networks should consider the three pathways for lead organizations to emerge in choosing their lead organization during each life-cycle phase.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000470 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{robin2026,
title = {{Dust in the wind? How leadership transitions unfold in purpose-oriented networks}},
author = {Robin Peeters et al.},
journal = {Health Care Management Review},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000470},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Dust in the wind? How leadership transitions unfold in purpose-oriented networks
AU - al., Robin Peeters et
JO - Health Care Management Review
PY - 2026
ER - Robin Peeters et al. (2026). Dust in the wind? How leadership transitions unfold in purpose-oriented networks. *Health Care Management Review*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000470 Robin Peeters et al.. "Dust in the wind? How leadership transitions unfold in purpose-oriented networks." *Health Care Management Review* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000470. Dust in the wind? How leadership transitions unfold in purpose-oriented networks
Robin Peeters et al. · Health Care Management Review · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000470 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.