Exploring esports as a platform to develop organizational teams: the case of Valorant

Brian McCauley

Team Performance Management2025https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-09-2024-0110article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

Purpose This study aims to explore the potential of a team-based esports game, Valorant, as a platform for developing individuals and teams in organizations. Design/methodology/approach This work represents an auto-netnographic exploration of a team-based esports title from a consumer perspective through extensive diaries recorded through the initial 10 weeks of play. Findings Three key themes are identified that illuminate the experience of entering a new team-based game experience. The results illustrate that at the core of Valorant is the team experience, which suggests potential for the game as a platform to develop teams and enhance relevant individual and team-based skills in organizational contexts. Organizational teams should benefit from the use of esports as a team development tool, but any such organizational initiative requires a structured approach. Virtual teams may benefit more than their co-located equivalents from the affordances of online team-based play. Originality/value This study is one of the few auto-netnographic explorations of a team-based game in esports. Valorant, as an increasingly popular game, remains underexplored in academic literature.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-09-2024-0110

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{brian2025,
  title        = {{Exploring esports as a platform to develop organizational teams: the case of Valorant}},
  author       = {Brian McCauley},
  journal      = {Team Performance Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-09-2024-0110},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Exploring esports as a platform to develop organizational teams: the case of Valorant

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.