Evaluating software academic impact in biomedical research based on large-scale full-text analysis
Yuzhuo Wang et al.
What the paper says
Objective. Analysing patterns of academic software mentions and their academic impact is essential for understanding the scholarly ecosystem and optimising research resources. Methods. This study focuses on the biomedical domain and investigates the prevalence and impact of software entities in scientific research. Rather than treating impact as a causal effect on research outcomes, we operationalise software impact as its scholarly presence, measured through the frequency of mention. Based on 1,500,334 articles from PubMed Central Open Access (PMC-OA), we collected disambiguated software entities mentioned in the full texts and extracted their features, including mention time, in-text location, and research subfields. Results. Overall, the impact of software in biomedical research continues to grow, with programs such as SPSS, GraphPad, and Mega demonstrating high academic influence. Within papers, software influence is concentrated in the Methods section and is dominated by general-purpose statistical tools, while other sections display greater diversity. Across fields, domains with high-software mention tend to rely on general-purpose software, whereas more specialised domains adopt software tailored to specific biomedical tasks. Conclusion. By tackling these questions, this study advances a systematic understanding of software role in biomedical research and provides a basis for further methodological refinement and empirical analysis.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.