arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Benefits, Challenges and Trade-Offs: Buyer and Contract Characteristics Valued by Small Farm Suppliers to Wholesale Marketing Channels

Michael Barrowclough et al.

Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics2019https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.292334article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.54

What the paper says

There is increasing interest in accessing local food products through 'conventional' food marketing systems. This study identifies and quantifies key contract characteristics and buyer attributes valued by small-scale produce farmers who are currently or are considering marketing into wholesale channels. Overall, produce farmers are receptive to entering into contracts with wholesale buyers. Substantial heterogeneity, however, is found among farmer attitudes toward the specific contract terms and in the trade-offs farmers are willing to accept between contract terms and buyer characteristics. Insights offered will enable produce buyers to more efficiently target potential suppliers and will facilitate more effective contract design.

11 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.292334

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{michael2019,
  title        = {{Benefits, Challenges and Trade-Offs: Buyer and Contract Characteristics Valued by Small Farm Suppliers to Wholesale Marketing Channels}},
  author       = {Michael Barrowclough et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics},
  year         = {2019},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.292334},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Benefits, Challenges and Trade-Offs: Buyer and Contract Characteristics Valued by Small Farm Suppliers to Wholesale Marketing Channels

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.54

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.