Go Big or Go Home? The “Price Tag” of Corporate Strategic Aggressiveness and Bond Issuance Spreads

Xiaofeng Li et al.

Accounting and Finance2026https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70164article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study examines whether—and through which mechanisms—corporate strategic aggressiveness affects bond spreads, using primary‐and secondary‐market data on bonds issued by Chinese A‐share–listed firms from 2004 to 2023. We find that greater strategic aggressiveness is associated with significantly wider bond issuance spreads. The association is stronger for state‐owned enterprises, non‐guaranteed issuers, labor‐intensive firms, firms in high‐tech, heavy‐polluting, and non‐digital sectors, and firms operating in less‐competitive industries. Mechanism tests indicate that heightened aggressiveness widens spreads primarily by increasing default risk. Corporate governance and information‐disclosure quality also serve as important transmission channels linking aggressiveness to spreads. Supplementary evidence shows that the effect on primary‐market issuance spreads propagates to secondary‐market credit spreads.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70164

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{xiaofeng2026,
  title        = {{Go Big or Go Home? The “Price Tag” of Corporate Strategic Aggressiveness and Bond Issuance Spreads}},
  author       = {Xiaofeng Li et al.},
  journal      = {Accounting and Finance},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70164},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Go Big or Go Home? The “Price Tag” of Corporate Strategic Aggressiveness and Bond Issuance Spreads

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.