Evolution of innovation and production supply chains: the case of microalgae-based β-carotene

Ruslana Rachel Palatnik et al.

European Review of Agricultural Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbaf019article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.44

Abstract

Establishing new bio-based sectors requires effective implementation of innovation and production supply chains, often competing with established synthetic technologies. Our analytical model conceptualizes the competition between an incumbent industry and a competitive fringe, each producing differentiated products. Although motivated by the β-carotene case, the model is versatile and applicable to other contexts involving novel products entering markets dominated by established technologies. Developed by university researchers and commercialized by start-ups, natural β-carotene was eventually integrated into major synthetic corporations. Initially niche and costly, it gained market competitiveness through innovation and expanded applications, driving technological advancements and significantly benefiting the broader algae-based industry.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbaf019

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ruslana2025,
  title        = {{Evolution of innovation and production supply chains: the case of microalgae-based β-carotene}},
  author       = {Ruslana Rachel Palatnik et al.},
  journal      = {European Review of Agricultural Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbaf019},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Evolution of innovation and production supply chains: the case of microalgae-based β-carotene

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.