arbiter
JournalsAccount

Institutions under Pressure: The Effect of Community Groups on Forest Preservation after a Natural Disaster

Prakash Pathak & Matthias Schündeln

The Economic Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueag003article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

We analyse the resilience of community-based institutions to large shocks. Our case study is on forest user groups in Nepal in the aftermath of the 2015 earthquake. We combine remote sensing data with detailed administrative data on forest user groups and exploit spatial variation in the intensity of the earthquake. Using a triple difference strategy, we show that the earthquake-induced increase in deforestation is significantly lower in locations with a higher share of forest covered by forest user groups. Thus, these institutions lead to more sustainable use of forests when they are under pressure. Regarding potential mechanisms, survey data suggest that social capital plays a role for the positive effects of forest user groups. More generally, our findings show that shifting governance of local resources to community-based institutions can be an effective policy in times of increased pressure on natural resources.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueag003

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{prakash2026,
  title        = {{Institutions under Pressure: The Effect of Community Groups on Forest Preservation after a Natural Disaster}},
  author       = {Prakash Pathak & Matthias Schündeln},
  journal      = {The Economic Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueag003},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Institutions under Pressure: The Effect of Community Groups on Forest Preservation after a Natural Disaster

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.