arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Central Bank Communication and Disagreement about the Natural Rate Hypothesis

Carola Binder

International Journal of Central Banking2021article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.56

What the paper says

About half of professional forecasters report that they use the natural rate of unemployment (u∗) to forecast. I show that forecasters' reported use of and estimates of u∗ are informative about their expectations-formation process, including their use of a Phillips curve. Those who report not using u∗ have higher and less anchored inflation expectations, and seem to have found the Federal Reserve's state-based forward guidance less credible. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) publishes participants' projections of longer-run unemployment in the Summary of Economic Projections. I document how and when the FOMC participants have disagreed with each other and with the private sector, discussing possible sources of disagreement and implications for credibility.

6 citations

Cite this paper

@article{carola2021,
  title        = {{Central Bank Communication and Disagreement about the Natural Rate Hypothesis}},
  author       = {Carola Binder},
  journal      = {International Journal of Central Banking},
  year         = {2021},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Central Bank Communication and Disagreement about the Natural Rate Hypothesis

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.56

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.53 × 0.4 = 0.21
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.