The final paradox: a systems-theoretical account of suicide

Mario S. Staller et al.

Kybernetes2026https://doi.org/10.1108/k-11-2025-2784article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Purpose This paper develops a systems-theoretical account of suicide as a terminal form of psychic self-reference. We aim to move beyond risk factor and dysfunction models by reconstructing suicide as a structurally coherent event within autopoietic psychic systems. We ask how, and under what conditions, a psychic system ceases its own operability when its self-referential dynamics become saturated across operational, reflective and reflexive levels. Design/methodology/approach The article offers a systems-theoretical reconstruction of suicide applying Luhmann’s theory of autopoietic systems to psychic systems, differentiating three forms of self-reference and analyzing their interrelations. Findings The analysis suggests that suicide can be described as a structurally saturated configuration of self-reference in which the psychic system continues to operate while at the same time configuring the conditions for its own cessation. Basal, reflective and reflexive self-reference converge into a closed loop that no longer generates meaningful variation. Suicide thus appears as a paradoxical terminal event: the point at which the system’s autopoiesis succeeds so consistently in reproducing its own form that this very success results in the completion and shutdown of further operations. Originality/value The paper provides what is, to our knowledge, the first coherent systems-theoretical theory of suicide grounded in the concept of autopoietic psychic systems. By reconstructing suicide as structurally saturated self-reference, it offers a novel conceptual vocabulary for suicidology. At the same time, it demonstrates how a shift in psychological theory – from substance-based notions of the psyche to systems-theoretical accounts – can be translated into a formally rigorous description of a paradigmatic phenomenon at the limits of psychic self-reference.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/k-11-2025-2784

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mario2026,
  title        = {{The final paradox: a systems-theoretical account of suicide}},
  author       = {Mario S. Staller et al.},
  journal      = {Kybernetes},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/k-11-2025-2784},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The final paradox: a systems-theoretical account of suicide

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.