arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Viscusi Circular A-4 Peer Review Comments and Guidance for Future Revisions

W. Kip Viscusi

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis2025https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2025.13article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract This article presents my 2023 peer review panel comments on the 2023 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-4 and offers recommendations for future revisions of this circular. The Prologue section introduces my official peer review comments and indicates how the structure of my comments was tailored to the guidelines established by the OMB. The main section consists of my 2023 peer review comments as they were submitted to OMB. I recommended changes in the draft Circular A-4 to increase the discount rate from the 1.7% rate that OMB proposed, to report domestic benefits whenever global benefits are reported, to adopt a behavioral transfer test for the use of behavioral economics findings, to update the procedures for estimating the value of a statistical life, and to abandon the proposed distributional weights. The most problematic component of the new Circular A-4 is the OMB distributional weights, which will shift the role of benefit–cost analyses away from the current role of providing an efficiency-oriented test. The Epilogue to my comments summarizes how the final version of Circular A-4 differs from the draft version and how future administrations might revise Circular A-4 after President Trump rescinded it.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2025.13

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{w.2025,
  title        = {{Viscusi Circular A-4 Peer Review Comments and Guidance for Future Revisions}},
  author       = {W. Kip Viscusi},
  journal      = {Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2025.13},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Viscusi Circular A-4 Peer Review Comments and Guidance for Future Revisions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.