arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Considering Equity in Green Infrastructure Using an Integrative Planning Framework for Green Infrastructure Implementation

Juita‐Elena Yusuf et al.

Public Works Management and Policy2025https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x251314421article
AJG 1
Weight
0.46

What the paper says

In coastal communities, green infrastructure can be part of the infrastructure investment strategy to revitalize existing infrastructure and provide protection from flooding, erosion, and other coastal hazards. This article asks the question: What are key equity considerations related to green infrastructure planning for coastal resilience? We answer this question using the voices of research experts, practitioners, and community members who participated in a virtual workshop designed to identify key questions and concerns about coastal resilience and social equity. These research and practice perspectives are synthesized using an integrative planning framework for green infrastructure implementation that was developed to answer the research question. Our findings identify equity touchpoints as they relate to four cross-cutting themes: (1) stakeholder engagement and public participation, (2) trade-offs and multiple benefits, (3) resources and capacity, and (4) data, metrics, and analysis.

4 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x251314421

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{juita‐elena2025,
  title        = {{Considering Equity in Green Infrastructure Using an Integrative Planning Framework for Green Infrastructure Implementation}},
  author       = {Juita‐Elena Yusuf et al.},
  journal      = {Public Works Management and Policy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x251314421},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Considering Equity in Green Infrastructure Using an Integrative Planning Framework for Green Infrastructure Implementation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.