Signal herding and contrarianism in REITs – dissemination of stock vs fixed-income factors

Nan Liu & Yuan Zhao

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-026-01487-9article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Herding and contrarian behaviours in financial markets have drawn significant attention due to their potential to distort prices. In the Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) market, both behaviours have been observed, though explanations often remain anecdotal. This paper provides further insights into herding and contrarianism in US equity REITs by analysing their inherent characteristics and the impact of exogenous informational signals. Our findings reveal frequent and prolonged contrarian behaviour, contrasted with sporadic and brief herding episodes at both the market and sub-sector levels. Our results highlight the dual nature of REITs, where return dispersions differ inherently between their stock and fixed-income characteristics. Moreover, information spillovers from the stock and debt markets, as well as signals from larger REITs, drive distinct investor behaviours. We also observe that herding tendencies increase when investors shift capital from the stock market and that excess return dispersion intensifies during recessions, reflecting a heightened reliance on private information in times of crisis.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-026-01487-9

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nan2026,
  title        = {{Signal herding and contrarianism in REITs – dissemination of stock vs fixed-income factors}},
  author       = {Nan Liu & Yuan Zhao},
  journal      = {Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-026-01487-9},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Signal herding and contrarianism in REITs – dissemination of stock vs fixed-income factors

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.