The migration–inequality debate: a reassessment through rent-seeking theory

François Facchini et al.

Journal of Institutional Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137426100447article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

According to the Roy–Borjas model, the most talented workers will choose to migrate to countries exhibiting high income inequalities to achieve the highest earnings. The purpose of this article is to highlight that income inequalities in the country of origin, particularly the nature of inequalities, will affect high-skilled emigration. If the home country rewards productive efforts and sanctions unproductive behaviours (such as rent-seeking), emigration declines. We test this hypothesis by relying on panel data of 30 OECD countries for the period from 1990 to 2010. Two econometric techniques are used: the ordinary least squares and the system-Generalized Method of Moments estimation to tackle the endogeneity issue. The results show that when income inequalities in the home country are conditioned by the institutions’ quality, there is a negative relationship between inequalities and high-skilled emigration, suggesting that productive inequalities are detrimental to emigration. Thus, developed countries facing high-skilled emigration must change the nature of inequalities by reforming their institutions in order to attract and retain the most talented workers. Implementing institutions that reward productive efforts would limit high-skilled emigration.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137426100447

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{françois2026,
  title        = {{The migration–inequality debate: a reassessment through rent-seeking theory}},
  author       = {François Facchini et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Institutional Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137426100447},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The migration–inequality debate: a reassessment through rent-seeking theory

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.