The energy performance gap and its determinants in Soviet-era multi-apartment buildings

Andrius Kažukauskas & Xiaoying Li

Baltic Journal of Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099x.2025.2455821article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Deep renovation, is seen as crucial in dealing with energy security and meeting climate targets, especially in post-Soviet countries with notoriously energy-inefficient residential housing stock. One critical question is whether these retrofits can achieve the energy savings promised by the engineering model. This paper assesses the energy performance gap–the discrepancy between realized energy savings and the predictions of engineers at the building level. In contrast to previous studies, we find that, on average, the predicted savings are fully realized for a retrofit programme of multi-apartment buildings in Lithuania. Among other factors, we consider how the differences in the energy performance gap for each building can be explained by energy efficiency measures, targeted energy class, and the type of multi-apartment building management. Interestingly, we find that multi-apartment buildings managed by outsourced specialized housing management companies tend to realize higher energy savings than buildings managed by communities of apartment owners.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099x.2025.2455821

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{andrius2025,
  title        = {{The energy performance gap and its determinants in Soviet-era multi-apartment buildings}},
  author       = {Andrius Kažukauskas & Xiaoying Li},
  journal      = {Baltic Journal of Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099x.2025.2455821},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The energy performance gap and its determinants in Soviet-era multi-apartment buildings

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.