arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Corrigendum: Integrity, ethical leadership, trust and work engagement

Unknown author

Leadership & Organization Development Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-02-2026-0208article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article Amos S. Engelbrecht, Gardielle Heine and Bright Mahembe (2017) “Integrity, ethical leadership, trust and work engagement”, published in Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 38, No. 3, https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2015-0237 did not reference two sources drawn upon. These were: Heine, G., “The Influence of Integrity and Ethical Leadership on Trust and Employee Work Engagement” (unpublished thesis: Stellenbosch University, 2013) and Engelbrecht, A.S, Heine, G. and Mahembe, B. (2014) “The influence of ethical leadership on trust and work engagement: an exploratory study”, SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, Vol. 40, No. 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v40i1.1210. The author guidelines for Leadership & Organization Development state that articles must be fully referenced. The authors sincerely apologise for this.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-02-2026-0208

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Corrigendum: Integrity, ethical leadership, trust and work engagement}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Leadership & Organization Development Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-02-2026-0208},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Corrigendum: Integrity, ethical leadership, trust and work engagement

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.