Failure (re-)framed: The Vietnamese Land Reforms through the lens of recapitulation reports

Ken MacLean

Journal of Southeast Asian Studies2024https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022463424000407article
ABDC C
Weight
0.30

What the paper says

The Vietnamese Communist Party adopted a rigid Maoist-model to foment class struggle to eradicate all traces of ‘feudalism’ and ‘capitalism’ across the northern countryside during the 1950s. The mass campaign began in late 1952 then ended abruptly in late 1956 due to the violent chaos it unleashed. A growing body of critical scholarship exists on this campaign; however, the importance of the final step in the campaign's model remains largely overlooked — namely, the ‘reorganisation’ of local Party cells, the goal of which was to extend Party control, especially in areas only recently liberated from French colonial rule. Lengthy, detailed, and confessional in nature, the reports present not only the mobilisation team's achievements, but also include extensive discussions of the failures arising from the team's efforts to assess, purify, and then consolidate the cells. The analysis focuses the ‘story-telling devices’ the report authors used to frame these outcomes. The findings contribute not only to the critical historiography of the tumultuous period, but also the emerging sub-field of failure studies.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022463424000407

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ken2024,
  title        = {{Failure (re-)framed: The Vietnamese Land Reforms through the lens of recapitulation reports}},
  author       = {Ken MacLean},
  journal      = {Journal of Southeast Asian Studies},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022463424000407},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Failure (re-)framed: The Vietnamese Land Reforms through the lens of recapitulation reports

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.30

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.