arbiter
JournalsAccount

Advancing Design Knowledge Reuse: A Framework for Circular Design Principles

Thorsten Schoormann et al.

Communications of the Association for Information Systems2025https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.05618article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.41

Abstract

Promoting the evolution of design knowledge is one of the most challenging tasks in design science research (DSR). Designers must build upon the available body of knowledge, reuse it within another setting, and reflect on the lessons learned during the use to advance the state of the art. As recent research points to limited reuse of both design knowledge and design artifacts, we believe that the process of codifying, enhancing, and building on previous research can be enriched by nuanced viewpoints and supportive practices. Against this backdrop, we transfer well-established theories for creating value through reuse from the field of circularity into a coherent framework for ‘circular design principles’. Our framework complements the existing guidance on reuse by (1) introducing lifecycle thinking of design knowledge, (2) theorizing about the process of reusing in DSR, as well as (3) diversifying the concept of reuse. In line with the accumulation tradition of research, we seek to aid scholars in operationalizing and complementing existing knowledge as well as positioning their papers as a form of reuse research.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.05618

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{thorsten2025,
  title        = {{Advancing Design Knowledge Reuse: A Framework for Circular Design Principles}},
  author       = {Thorsten Schoormann et al.},
  journal      = {Communications of the Association for Information Systems},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.05618},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Advancing Design Knowledge Reuse: A Framework for Circular Design Principles

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.