← Back to results Executive remuneration under scrutiny: The cutting edge of the ‘shareholder spring’ Jim Corkery & Sabina Medarevic
What the paper says As profits and share prices in large corporations fell in recent years, the venerable argument that high pay levels must exist to attract the best people lost credibility. Disgruntled shareholders focussed on excessive levels of executive remuneration. They began to act in concert to discourage excessive remuneration. They voiced other concerns, too. The ‘shareholder spring’ had arrived.
4 citations
Open paper page → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6925 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{jim2013,
title = {{Executive remuneration under scrutiny: The cutting edge of the ‘shareholder spring’}},
author = {Jim Corkery & Sabina Medarevic},
journal = {Enterprise Governance eJournal},
year = {2013},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6925},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Executive remuneration under scrutiny: The cutting edge of the ‘shareholder spring’
AU - Corkery, Jim
AU - Medarevic, Sabina
JO - Enterprise Governance eJournal
PY - 2013
ER - Jim Corkery & Sabina Medarevic (2013). Executive remuneration under scrutiny: The cutting edge of the ‘shareholder spring’. *Enterprise Governance eJournal*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6925 Jim Corkery & Sabina Medarevic. "Executive remuneration under scrutiny: The cutting edge of the ‘shareholder spring’." *Enterprise Governance eJournal* (2013). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6925. Executive remuneration under scrutiny: The cutting edge of the ‘shareholder spring’
Jim Corkery & Sabina Medarevic · Enterprise Governance eJournal · 2013
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6925 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.