arbiter
JournalsAccount

The costs of conditionality. IPCEIs and the constrained politics of EU industrial policy

Luuk Schmitz et al.

Competition and Change2025https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251320675article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.60

Abstract

With the global return of industrial policy, most literature examines why states increasingly resort to market activism. Much less is known about how industrial policy works “on the ground.” In this paper, we address this how-question through an in-depth case study of the poster child of the EU’s new industrial policy: the Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEI). We argue that while the literature has rightly pointed out that attaching conditionalities to public money is key to steering markets effectively and equitably, conditionalities also come with costs. Moreover, they are not the reflection of policy design principles but reflect political, institutional, and ideational constraints that shape which and how conditionalities are applied. We show how the constrained politics of EU industrial policy have shaped both the creation and application of the conditionalities that govern IPCEIs, and how this has led to costs in the form of perverse outcomes, adverse selection, and workarounds.

14 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251320675

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{luuk2025,
  title        = {{The costs of conditionality. IPCEIs and the constrained politics of EU industrial policy}},
  author       = {Luuk Schmitz et al.},
  journal      = {Competition and Change},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251320675},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The costs of conditionality. IPCEIs and the constrained politics of EU industrial policy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.60

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.62 × 0.4 = 0.25
M · momentum0.85 × 0.15 = 0.13
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.