Farmer Identity and risk preferences in Farmers' Choices Between Public and Private Agri-Environmental Contracts

Moritz Peter Fritschle et al.

Q Open: A Journal of Agricultural, Climate, Environmental, Food, Resource, and Rural Development Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoag005article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract European farmers' preferences for voluntary agri-environmental contracts are often heterogene-ous and can be influenced by behavioural factors. In our study, we investigate how farmer identity and risk preferences are related to preferences for agri-environment contracts in the UK, France, and the Netherlands. Using data from a discrete choice experiment and a sample of 767 farmers, we identify a statistically significant, but non-robust, effect showing that a stronger relative productivist farmer identity is associated with a higher preference for contracts organised by retail companies over those organised by governments. Furthermore, results show that a stronger relative productivist identity reduces the likelihood to participate in the proposed agri-environment contracts.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoag005

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{moritz2026,
  title        = {{Farmer Identity and risk preferences in Farmers' Choices Between Public and Private Agri-Environmental Contracts}},
  author       = {Moritz Peter Fritschle et al.},
  journal      = {Q Open: A Journal of Agricultural, Climate, Environmental, Food, Resource, and Rural Development Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoag005},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Farmer Identity and risk preferences in Farmers' Choices Between Public and Private Agri-Environmental Contracts

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.