The unintended side effect of the global financial safety net: elite capital flight

Bernhard Reinsberg & Andreas Kern

Business and Politics2025https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2025.10016article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Abstract What drives elite capital flight into offshore destinations? While existing literature focuses on regulatory gaps or global tax competition, international bailouts themselves can catalyze elite capital flight. Specifically, we examine how two instruments of the Global Financial Safety Net (GFSN)—the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the People’s Bank of China (PBoC)’s swap lines—impact elite incentives to move wealth offshore. We develop a two-dimensional framework centered on Disbursement Control and Elite Threat Perception to theorize when and how elites extract and expatriate wealth. Using data from 201 countries between 1990 and 2018, we find that the anticipation of IMF programs increases offshore bank deposits by 14.2%, consistent with elites responding to rising threat perception. By contrast, the introduction of PBoC swap lines increases offshore deposits by 92.3%, reflecting extraction under low disbursement control, enabling moral hazard. We illustrate the core mechanisms of our argument through mini-case studies of Angola, Tajikistan, and Mongolia. Our findings reveal a structural vulnerability in the GFSN stemming from regulatory fragmentation and uncoordinated oversight.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2025.10016

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{bernhard2025,
  title        = {{The unintended side effect of the global financial safety net: elite capital flight}},
  author       = {Bernhard Reinsberg & Andreas Kern},
  journal      = {Business and Politics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2025.10016},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The unintended side effect of the global financial safety net: elite capital flight

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.