Prototyping a tool to layer lived experience narratives onto systems maps

Ellen Stewart et al.

International Journal of Social Research Methodology2026https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2026.2640917article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Systems mapping approaches have attracted international interest for their value to policy actors. However, the maps they create can seem impersonal and disconnected from the lived experience of the communities that policy actors serve. This paper introduces our prototype tool designed to bring systems mapping, research evidence on causal connections, and lived experience narratives together. Our inspiration came from Community Panels of people with lived experience of health inequalities, who felt that evidence-based causal maps de-personalised the issues, and jettisoned subjective, emotive experiences, especially those of marginalised groups. We share images of the layered mapping tool, document and reflect on the process of creating it, and report early feedback workshops with policymakers and Community Panel participants on how far this practice-based innovation succeeds in bridging lived experience and policy-facing systems mapping.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2026.2640917

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ellen2026,
  title        = {{Prototyping a tool to layer lived experience narratives onto systems maps}},
  author       = {Ellen Stewart et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Social Research Methodology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2026.2640917},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Prototyping a tool to layer lived experience narratives onto systems maps

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.