Proposing practice recommendations for adaptive sports for the disciplines of recreational therapy, exercise physiology, and athletic training

Allie Thomas et al.

American Journal of Recreation Therapy2025https://doi.org/10.5055/ajrt.0308article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The disciplines of recreational therapy, exercise physiology, and athletic training work with adaptive sport athletes in various capacities, but practice recommendations for this interprofessional work are not yet established. Therefore, the aim of this study was to propose practice recommendations for these three disciplines working in adaptive sports. This qualitative research used focus group interviews with participants from the three disciplines. Findings included two themes for practice recommendations for all disciplines (interprofessional collaboration and holistic athlete care) and three additional, discipline-specific themes [recreational therapy as disability specialists using the assessment, planning, implementation, evaluation, and documentation process, exercise physiologists as training as challenging, safe, and empowering, and athletic training as emergency action plan]. Discussions of implications for interprofessional work in adaptive sport and future research directions are further presented.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5055/ajrt.0308

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{allie2025,
  title        = {{Proposing practice recommendations for adaptive sports for the disciplines of recreational therapy, exercise physiology, and athletic training}},
  author       = {Allie Thomas et al.},
  journal      = {American Journal of Recreation Therapy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5055/ajrt.0308},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Proposing practice recommendations for adaptive sports for the disciplines of recreational therapy, exercise physiology, and athletic training

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.