arbiter
JournalsAccount

Critical Insights into the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Mental Health, Patient Rights, and Human Rights

S.M. Chavan et al.

Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal2025https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v19i1.13article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies are changing many aspects of contemporary life, including the emergence of mental healthcare as a field for innovation. This interdisciplinary research investigates the complex interactions between Artificial Intelligence, Mental Health Care, Patient Rights, and Human Rights to assess the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating AI into Mental Health Services. Globally, millions of people suffer from mental disorders, placing significant strains on health systems and societies. Mental health care has always been restricted due to stigma, structural barriers and lack of resources, often leading to an inability to provide accessible and effective treatments despite increasing patient demands. AI technology has emerged as a possible solution for age-old issues like efficient early detection methods, treatment strategies, and personal follow-up. Conversely, AI application in this delicate area raises ethical and legal dilemmas about people’s freedoms, which must be assessed critically, and predictable steps must be taken to protect patient rights.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v19i1.13

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{s.m.2025,
  title        = {{Critical Insights into the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Mental Health, Patient Rights, and Human Rights}},
  author       = {S.M. Chavan et al.},
  journal      = {Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v19i1.13},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Critical Insights into the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Mental Health, Patient Rights, and Human Rights

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.