arbiter
JournalsAccount

What Could Have Been: Predicted and Actual Exclusion by Potential Romantic Partners and Platonic Friends

Natasha R. Wood et al.

European Journal of Social Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70066article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Romantic partners are instrumental to more goals than friends, and therefore, people have more to lose when denied a romantic relationship than a friendship. We explored people's forecasted and experienced rejection by a potential romantic partner or friend. In Study 1, participants ( N = 1500) reported their lay beliefs about which experience would hurt more. Twice as many people indicated that potential romantic (vs. friend) rejection would be worse. In Studies 2 and 3, participants ( N = 934, 477 respectively) were accepted or rejected by potential romantic partners or friends. The source of the exclusion did not impact participants’ forecasted or experienced affect or needs satisfaction. However, participants overestimated the pain of exclusion. Despite believing romantic rejection would hurt more when directly comparing it to platonic rejection and forecasting an exaggeration of this hurt, exclusion appears universally painful, and the potential relationship between the source and target matters little.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70066

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{natasha2026,
  title        = {{What Could Have Been: Predicted and Actual Exclusion by Potential Romantic Partners and Platonic Friends}},
  author       = {Natasha R. Wood et al.},
  journal      = {European Journal of Social Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70066},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

What Could Have Been: Predicted and Actual Exclusion by Potential Romantic Partners and Platonic Friends

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.