A multilevel, longitudinal examination of goal conflict & goal harmony

Juliette L. Ratchford et al.

European Journal of Personality2026https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070261432959article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Contemporary theories of personality dynamics propose that adaptive functioning in daily life requires effective coordination of multiple goals. Goal conflict, where the pursuit of one goal lowers the ability to pursue another goal, and goal harmony, where the pursuit of one goal facilitates the pursuit of another, are typically viewed as direct opposites, but empirical evidence suggests that they represent distinct processes. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether goal conflict and goal harmony are dynamically linked over time—and whether that link differs when examined (a) within people for specific goals versus (b) between people across their overall goal systems. Goal conflict and harmony were investigated in two studies ( N Total = 849) using multilevel random-intercept cross-lagged panel models. At the within-person level, goal harmony and goal conflict were negatively associated both at a concurrent and cross-lagged level. At the between-person level, goal conflict and goal harmony were not significantly associated. These findings indicate that goal harmony and goal conflict are in tension, on average, in the context of specific goals but not associated when considered across the entire goal system. This research advances our understanding of how people pursue multiple goals.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070261432959

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{juliette2026,
  title        = {{A multilevel, longitudinal examination of goal conflict & goal harmony}},
  author       = {Juliette L. Ratchford et al.},
  journal      = {European Journal of Personality},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070261432959},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A multilevel, longitudinal examination of goal conflict & goal harmony

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.