Getting to the Root Causes: An Integrative Framework for Understanding and Mitigating Unethical Workplace Behavior

David Welsh et al.

Academy of Management Perspectives2026https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2024.0236article
AJG 4ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Despite a proliferation of research, the behavioral ethics literature remains fragmented, making it difficult for managers to translate findings into practice. A common pitfall is assuming that unethical behaviors that appear identical stem from the same cause and should be managed the same way. Our applied integration addresses this gap by synthesizing the literature into a cohesive, causally driven framework. We identify three core causal pathways—perceptual, regulatory, and calculative—that underlie unethical actions. This framework links these pathways to three distinct forms of misconduct: ethical errors (due to misperception), ethical lapses (due to self-regulatory failure), and ethical violations (due to deliberate calculation). By distinguishing unethical behaviors based on their causal roots, this framework provides a more precise diagnostic tool, enabling managers to implement targeted interventions and advance practical guidance for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of workplace misconduct.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2024.0236

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{david2026,
  title        = {{Getting to the Root Causes: An Integrative Framework for Understanding and Mitigating Unethical Workplace Behavior}},
  author       = {David Welsh et al.},
  journal      = {Academy of Management Perspectives},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2024.0236},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Getting to the Root Causes: An Integrative Framework for Understanding and Mitigating Unethical Workplace Behavior

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.