LinkedIn in Business and Technical Communication: A Textbook Analysis Grounded in Digital Literacy

Sarah Moore & Kathryn Lookadoo

Business and Professional Communication Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906251405411article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The study highlights the crucial role of professional social media and LinkedIn instruction for students seeking employment. An analysis of 20 business and technical communication textbooks identifies significant gaps between textbook guidance and real-world expectations. Some textbooks in both fields fall short in offering actionable strategies for creating and maintaining a professional social media presence. While many textbooks emphasize the importance of social media or LinkedIn, most fail to provide concrete examples or best practices, such as keyword optimization for AI, effective networking strategies, and best practices for posting content. Grounded in digital literacy theory and professional identity formation, the study provides teaching recommendations, including the identification and adoption of supplemental materials to teach professional social media usage.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906251405411

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sarah2026,
  title        = {{LinkedIn in Business and Technical Communication: A Textbook Analysis Grounded in Digital Literacy}},
  author       = {Sarah Moore & Kathryn Lookadoo},
  journal      = {Business and Professional Communication Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906251405411},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

LinkedIn in Business and Technical Communication: A Textbook Analysis Grounded in Digital Literacy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.