Chinese import dominance and structural transformation in Africa

Washingtone Onyango et al.

Oxford Development Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2025.2451988article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

This study analyzes the effect of China’s import dominance on Africa’s structural transformation, measured through the Shapley decomposition approach. A pooled mean group Autoregressive Distributed Lag (PMG-ARDL) model is analyzed using panel data from 1995–2018 for 21 countries. We find that Chinese imports of goods and services, like those from the rest of the world, increase Africa’s structural transformation in the long-run. However, the magnitude of the coefficient for China is larger than that of the rest of the world for both goods and services (total). The Chinese impact on Africa’s structural transformation is mainly through capital goods and other commercial services (such as ICT, financial, and construction), whose coefficients are larger than those of the rest of the world. Imposing barriers on Chinese imports is not a viable option for African countries. Instead, they should pursue policies that enrich the manufacturing sector, including adopting an Africa-wide trade agreement.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2025.2451988

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{washingtone2025,
  title        = {{Chinese import dominance and structural transformation in Africa}},
  author       = {Washingtone Onyango et al.},
  journal      = {Oxford Development Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2025.2451988},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Chinese import dominance and structural transformation in Africa

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.