The Social Context of Spatial Choice: Activity Locations and Residential Segregation

Liang Cai et al.

Demography2026https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-12475908article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Despite considerable focus on clustering as a dimension of segregation and the explosion of big location data, the extant literature has not explicitly examined residential racial segregation and the clustering of racially segregated space as an influence on mobility. Drawing on urban sociological theories, we test criteria contributing to individuals' selection of key activity neighborhoods. Using a range of spatial data sources, we compare White and Black individuals' choice of frequently visited neighborhoods in Chicago, stratified by whether residing in a contiguous segregated cluster (CSC). Discrete choice models show evidence for the impact of clustered residential segregation in individual decision-making. Net of distance, all groups are drawn to White CSC neighborhoods. White residents exhibit a pattern of geographic isolation, gravitating toward White CSC tracts and away from Black spaces, CSC and non-CSC alike. Black residents of Black CSC neighborhoods are more likely to have activity locations in White CSC neighborhoods than their own residential CSC, largely because of the relative institutional, amenity, and crime-related advantages of these areas. Results are robust to alternative specifications of choice sets and institutional deficits. Implications for understanding the social context of routine location choice and designing desegregation policies through behavioral "nudges" are discussed.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-12475908

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{liang2026,
  title        = {{The Social Context of Spatial Choice: Activity Locations and Residential Segregation}},
  author       = {Liang Cai et al.},
  journal      = {Demography},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-12475908},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Social Context of Spatial Choice: Activity Locations and Residential Segregation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.