arbiter
JournalsAccount

Repugnance without Mere Addition

Tomi Francis

Economics and Philosophy2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267125100631article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper concerns the difficulty of avoiding an additive version of the Very Repugnant Conclusion. An impossibility theorem is provided which shows that we cannot avoid this version of the Repugnant Conclusion even if we deny the Mere Addition Principle and closely related principles which place limits on the badness of adding happy people, such as “Dominance Addition” and additive “Non-Sadism” conditions. I argue that the impossibility theorem shows that the additive version of the Very Repugnant Conclusion cannot reasonably be avoided by population-ethical means alone. One must instead either deny structural conditions such as acyclicity, adopt a radically unorthodox fixed-population axiology, or accept this version of the Very Repugnant Conclusion.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267125100631

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tomi2026,
  title        = {{Repugnance without Mere Addition}},
  author       = {Tomi Francis},
  journal      = {Economics and Philosophy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267125100631},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Repugnance without Mere Addition

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.