Illuminating the relative dominance of awareness and pervasiveness over visibility in organizational ICT affordances

Ward van Zoonen et al.

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication2025https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaf006article
AJG 3
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

Contemporary discourse on the affordances of organizational information and communication technologies (ICTs) has largely been captivated by the allure of visibility. This article challenges that glare by elucidating the overlooked yet pivotal roles of a set of other organizational ICT affordances. Through a dominance analysis, our findings illuminate that awareness—the capacity of ICTs to link information and actors in an ongoing digital tapestry—and pervasiveness—the widespread nature, across time and space, of digital content and interactions—hold greater explanatory power compared to visibility in understanding some types of interactions fostered by ICTs (communication frequency, information-sharing quality at work [within and across departments], and identity processes [departmental and organizational]). By spotlighting the explanatory strength of affordances such as awareness and pervasiveness and somewhat dimming the role of visibility, this study urges scholars and practitioners alike to broaden their focus on the affordances of media in the digital workplace.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaf006

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ward2025,
  title        = {{Illuminating the relative dominance of awareness and pervasiveness over visibility in organizational ICT affordances}},
  author       = {Ward van Zoonen et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaf006},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Illuminating the relative dominance of awareness and pervasiveness over visibility in organizational ICT affordances

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.