arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Integration of entrepreneurial opportunity theories in uncertain scenarios

Chengbin Wang et al.

Journal of Competitiveness2025https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2025.01.01article
AJG 2
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Entrepreneurial opportunities serve as the foundational element of entrepreneurial endeavors and a potent stimulus for innovative action.The origins of entrepreneurial opportunities have long been debated between creation and discovery perspectives.Through a rigorous combination of participatory research, literature analysis, and deductive reasoning, this study refines the formulas for opportunity creation and discovery, revealing the underlying mechanisms of opportunity generation.By integrating theories of uncertainty and entrepreneurship, we propose a nuanced theoretical framework that bridges the gap between the two dominant perspectives.This framework reveals the mechanism of entrepreneurial opportunity generation and offers a nuanced understanding of the interplay between innovation and entrepreneurship, providing valuable insights for both researchers and practitioners.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2025.01.01

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{chengbin2025,
  title        = {{Integration of entrepreneurial opportunity theories in uncertain scenarios}},
  author       = {Chengbin Wang et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Competitiveness},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2025.01.01},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Integration of entrepreneurial opportunity theories in uncertain scenarios

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.