Automated credit limit increases and consumer welfare

Vitaly M. Bord et al.

Journal of Monetary Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2026.103901article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In the United States, credit card companies frequently use machine learning algorithms to proactively raise credit limits for borrowers. In contrast, an increasing number of countries have begun to prohibit credit limit increases initiated by banks rather than consumers. In this paper, we exploit detailed regulatory micro data to examine the extent to which bank-initiated credit limit increases are directed towards individuals with revolving debt. We then develop a model that captures the costs and benefits of regulating proactive credit limit increases, which we use to quantify their importance and evaluate the implications for household well-being. • US banks proactively raise credit card limits, a practice often restricted abroad. • Limit increases supply nearly half as much credit as new credit card originations. • Limit increases most likely for revolving borrowers, who are more profitable. • Borrowing rises after limit increases, even for unconstrained consumers. • In a structural model, restricting proactive credit limit increases improves welfare.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2026.103901

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{vitaly2026,
  title        = {{Automated credit limit increases and consumer welfare}},
  author       = {Vitaly M. Bord et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Monetary Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2026.103901},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Automated credit limit increases and consumer welfare

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.