Consumption responses and redistributive implications of luxury durable tax rebates

Tanisa Tawichsri

Fiscal Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.70016article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper evaluates the impact of tax rebates on luxury durables, using Thailand's 2011 car tax rebate as a case study. Utilising a stochastic dynamic model with heterogeneous agents, where cars serve as both luxury goods and illiquid assets, the study finds that the policy effectively boosted consumption by targeting households with a high propensity to spend. However, it was regressive, primarily benefiting high‐income households and leading to prolonged negative effects on household spending and saving. Additionally, the policy caused second‐hand car prices to drop. This enabled lower‐income households to purchase used cars at lower costs, but further prolonged and deepened cuts in non‐durable spending and savings. Using the estimated parameters and the shocks to the interest rate in the policy experiment, the simulated short‐run elasticity of intertemporal substitution for Thailand is low – typically between 0 and 0.1. Wealthier and older households increase spending in response to the rate increase, whereas poorer and younger households tend to boost saving instead.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.70016

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tanisa2026,
  title        = {{Consumption responses and redistributive implications of luxury durable tax rebates}},
  author       = {Tanisa Tawichsri},
  journal      = {Fiscal Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.70016},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Consumption responses and redistributive implications of luxury durable tax rebates

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.