Policy fit: lessons from ocean governance in Australia

Liam Fullbrook & Joanna Vince

Policy Science2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-026-09602-2article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Achieving policy change in complex governance systems remains a persistent challenge, particularly where transformative integration is needed but institutional resistance is strong. This paper introduces policy fit as a novel approach comprising three dimensions: structural compatibility, shared understanding, and systemic responsiveness. Through analysis of Australia’s attempts at integrated ocean management (IOM); Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) and Australia’s Oceans Policy (AOP), we demonstrate how policy fit serves as both a diagnostic tool for identifying barriers to effective change and a design principle for achieving meaningful integration within existing constraints. These cases reveal that ambitious policies lacking alignment across the three dimensions inevitably encounter insurmountable resistance from entrenched institutions, cognitive fragmentation, and veto points. Policy fit offers practitioners a strategic incrementalist pathway that works with, rather than against, existing governance structures, enabling sustainable integration through calculated alignment rather than wholesale institutional restructuring. This approach represents a vital alternative to transformative policies that encounter insurmountable institutional resistance, offering instead a pragmatic path toward sustainable policy change in complex systems.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-026-09602-2

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{liam2026,
  title        = {{Policy fit: lessons from ocean governance in Australia}},
  author       = {Liam Fullbrook & Joanna Vince},
  journal      = {Policy Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-026-09602-2},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Policy fit: lessons from ocean governance in Australia

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.