The ‘environment-economy’ asymmetric effect of land conservation and intensive use policies: evidence from quasi-natural experiments at the county level in China

Hongjuan Yu et al.

Environment and Development Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x26100552article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study treats the selection of land conservation and intensive use model counties as a quasi-natural experiment. Using Chinese county-level panel data, we evaluate the multidimensional impacts of the land conservation and intensive use policy (LCIUP). We find that LCIUP reduced PM2.5 concentrations in counties while simultaneously lowering per capita GDP, exerting a positive effect on environmental quality but a negative inhibitory effect on economic growth, showing a distinct environment–economy asymmetry. LCIUP restricts industrial land supply and curbs the entry of polluting enterprises, but fails to facilitate industrial transformation and upgrading. Counties reliant on secondary industries face significant industrial transformation lock-in challenges, while those with substantial market potential can achieve dual economic and environmental goals. Green finance policies effectively complement LCIUP to promote industrial transformation and upgrading, whereas technological innovation and talent attraction policies currently lack such synergy. Cost–benefit analysis confirms that LCIUP’s marginal environmental benefits outweigh economic losses.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x26100552

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hongjuan2026,
  title        = {{The ‘environment-economy’ asymmetric effect of land conservation and intensive use policies: evidence from quasi-natural experiments at the county level in China}},
  author       = {Hongjuan Yu et al.},
  journal      = {Environment and Development Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x26100552},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The ‘environment-economy’ asymmetric effect of land conservation and intensive use policies: evidence from quasi-natural experiments at the county level in China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.